reflections shares: 2011 review AV. BARC IAPD IUKD
- December 2013 (2)
- November 2013 (6)
- October 2013 (5)
- September 2013 (5)
- August 2013 (4)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (5)
- May 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (6)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (3)
- November 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (8)
- September 2012 (10)
- August 2012 (5)
- July 2012 (7)
- June 2012 (5)
- May 2012 (12)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (5)
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (7)
- December 2011 (6)
- November 2011 (8)
- October 2011 (6)
- September 2011 (3)
- August 2011 (8)
- July 2011 (5)
- June 2011 (8)
- May 2011 (7)
- April 2011 (9)
- March 2011 (9)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (8)
- December 2010 (10)
- November 2010 (7)
- October 2010 (10)
- September 2010 (8)
- August 2010 (6)
- July 2010 (10)
- June 2010 (13)
- May 2010 (10)
- April 2010 (16)
- November 2007 (1)
Most people do their new year review in January, and it’s still January, even if I’m nearly a month late. Last year I was looking for income, and this year I can look back, and conclude that I got it, to the tune of about 4% on the cost of what I put in. That’s possibly a minor fail as I target 5%, but I only have two-and-a-half year’s worth in my ISA and I buy throughout the year. So it’s possible that the ramp up across the year has something to do with that.
Diversification is okay. I’ve sliced this by sector rather than geography. I have terrible geographical diversification in my ISA, 93% UK exposure. A lot of these companies are big fish so I am not 90% exposed to the UK domestic market, which would have me running for the hills. I have much more than my ISA in pension AVCs balanced 50:50 UK/emerging markets so I am okay with that geographical imbalance.
The investment trusts are going to start to be a problem with evaluating diversification, unless I find a way of representing their internal structure.
There’s a theory that in a HYP you shouldn’t look at the capital value it’s hard to resist. Mine happens to be a little bit up on purchase cost after I take out the dividend income – it depends when you look at it so it’s hard to say how much. So the total value is constant, as inflation knocked 5% off the value of money. For comparison the FTAS is off about 3%, not sure what the yield on that is. At times in August 2011 my ISA was 7% down on purchase cost. There’s no real statistical significance I can ascribe to this with such a high noise level in the signal.
I bought shares in five different companies this year, added to an existing holding, and intruduced low level of index tracking to benchmark how I am doing in future. I will use more index tracking for foreign markets. It’s expensive to trade individual shares in non-UK markets for me and what the hell do I know about companies in emerging markets anyway. Something that concerns me is that index tracking is totally dumb money, and if it is targeting a popular index like the S&P500 that dumb money may unbalance valuations. I look at popular index tracking as a potential source of trouble for concentrated indices like the FTSE100 (which I don’t track in my ISA) or the S&P500, which I may track at some point.
what went wrong
I screwed up a few times and crystallised nearly a thousand pounds of losses, though I also crystallised about £500 of gains. Dealing costs this year were at most £90, there are no annual charges.
I should never have bought BARC, but at least saved my hide by acknowledging the mistake for the cost of a couple of hundred quid. The draw of my past history as a speculator sometimes breaks out. How am I to evaluate what is a fair price for a bank in this environment, FFS, especially a slippery bunch of characters like Barclays? I got sick of Aviva acting as a europanicometer, it fits most of my requirements but I couldn’t stomach the volatility. I should have either qualified the volatility first or held out for a lower price, which would make the volatility easier to take. I know that’s called price anchoring, but I can only fight so many investing character foibles in any one year.
Having two financials added a huge degree of day by day volatility. And I hate Euro exposure at the moment. No good will come of it IMO until people work out exactly what they want the Euro to do for them, and then do whatever’s needed to make it do that. Or surrender to the steamroller of the irresistible force of the market meeting the immovable object of the canard that is a unified currency without a unified government…
Other shares I’ve sold I should have let be and left them to mind their own business, reviewing what I thought at the time and what happened since. I move all sales to a ‘sold’ portfolio in iii to keep a watch on how that went. It is instructive, in general the right response to a sell urge (other than BARC) is to ignore it. Selling IAPD was daft, it wasn’t really doing any harm in my portfolio, it just a little down. D’oh.
Selling IUKD was good after I discovered it didn’t really match what I thought it did, ie value invest. IUKD can be ascribed to a failure of research and thinking, so the need to back out of it was reasonable, it’s better to acknowledge a mistake and correct it that leave it to fester. It’s also a reminder that income investing is inherently subjective, no passive approach is possible because of the problem of identifying and avoiding value traps.
what did I learn from 2011?
Overall, I seem to be OK on picking what to buy and a bit on the trigger-happy side in selling. If I’d taken Charlie Munger’s punch-card approach and just sat on my hands as far as selling I’d have done better, even after eating an increased loss on BARC. Guess that’s why Charlie is Warren Buffett’s wingman and not me, eh?
Becoming a better investor is largely about mastering impulsive tendencies and getting lost in the fog of war, I paid £500 for the training this year which isn’t so bad. Something I have noticed is it is far easier to retain equanimity in the face of individual variations once there is a decent number of holdings and reasonably sector-diversified. I have 12 holdings, though two are index funds and two are investment trusts and therefore internally diversified again. Half of these I’ve held since buying them in the first full year of having this ISA.
what went right?
The big picture did. For all the cock-ups, I consider I did okay and reasonably battle-tested the greater stability of income versus the volatility of share values. There’s no need for me to take along my CV to become a trader in the City of London, and I’m still a little way from matching unemployment benefit in income, but getting there. In some ways investing against my worldview makes the exercise a lot more intellectual which makes it easier to stand back and learn. I’d hope not to look back at the end of 2012 and have repeated too many of 2011′s mistakes. Heck, there are no end of new mistakes I can explore this year
I was able to weather serious market volatility (and even buy into some of it) during the summer riots, US budget freeze-up induced volatility and general bad temper without taking too much of a hit. However, the Eurozone break-up is yet to come, and that will test nerves no end. The FTAS suffered a 50% fall from July 2007 to April 2009 so there’s precedent for some serious grief ahead.
2011 was a rough year, but I was genuinely surprised to find out I hadn’t taken more of a hit this year. For this year I want to diversify into oil, mining, and beef up utilities. The pharma didn’t start off so high, it had the temerity to quietly go away and increase of itself, so I’ll leave it be and go elsewhere this coming ISA year.
Geographically I could do with some US exposure, and maybe some AsiaPac again. I’m still just not going to do China, but India may appeal. Theory would indicate I should also increase Europe exposure, but I just can’t bring myself to do it at the moment. Temporal diversity seemed to work too, buying across the year rather than all at the start or all at the end smoothed some of the volatility.
unlike most people, I don’t invest for the world I expect
Keeping a clear head is difficult for me because my world view remains that industrial civilisation is running on borrowed time. Events this year seem only to confirm that the assumptions behind our economy are failing. Unemployment is still rising, to levels among the young that I have never seen.
To me this looks like the advance guard of globalisation and resource crunches reducing Western living standards. It will happen for the rest of the Western population by inflation as governments create money to service their promises to the electorate; “you will be poorer tomorrow that you are today” is not a vote-winning thing to say. Mervyn King claimed that we have averted a Great Depression. The time you can say that is when you look back at the darkened valleys from the sunlit uplands of the next bull market, not when growth has switched back into reverse and we are about to enter the second dip.
We have had an oil war in Iraq, another one in Libya, about to have another one in Iran. Oil is the magic that enables the myth of continuous growth, and the last decade has seen us add a huge number of people who want a slice of that action, just as production seems to be levelling off for the decline.
These problems seem to be inherent in industrial civilisation – as JK Galbraith said in The Age of Uncertainty
The present age of contentment will come to an end only when and if the adverse developments that it fosters challenge the sense of comfortable well-being.
Galbraith had another pithy quote, however, for those who would act on their specific worldview.
the only difference is between those who know they don’t know and those who don’t know they don’t know
Unlike some, who are upbeat enough to see sunrise as a bullish indicator I am fighting my beliefs to invest in the market at all. I have also diversified to non-financial investments to hedge against being totally wiped out in a financial firestorm, assuming some form of the rule of law still held. If it doesn’t, I just have to do the best I can with whatever I have to hand, you can’t save against that…
2011 had the London riots, and all over Europe we see high youth unemployment. Across the West the Occupy movement gives some expression to the feeling that something, somewhere is more fundamentally wrong. Greece is yet again to surrender more sovereignty to the technocrats, because the one thing they can’t do is take the hit for their uncompetitive ways through currency devaluation. I wonder if there is the scent of Steinbeck’s bitter harvest rising in the air
“In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.”
I aim to become a better investor over time
Reviewing what happened, and discriminating between errors of judgement, and random noise seem to be the key here. I slowly grind out some of the foibles and irrational predilections over time. I think it begins to show. Fortunately in the way an ISA works with the limited input, I was able to remind myself of some of the things that I should have learned in the dot-com bust with the least amount of money at risk. The road to self-improvement is rarely a straight line. The Delphic Oracle’s enigmatic Know Thyself is the key here, so that when, eventually, my ISA holdings begin to deliver about half my income I should be a safer pair of hands.
So despite a naturally fearful and non-optimistic viewpoint, an ermine’s ISA survived intact and delivered most of its aims, indeed it’s the second year that the yield has been > 4% on purchase cost. Although I don’t use the income at the moment, it would be a decent bump up in tax-free income if I did use it.
One of the limitations of an ISA is also starting to make itself apparent. If I leave work this year, I will be spending several of the next few years trying to get money into the ISA in order to win a tax-free income from it. The money I’ve saved in pension AVCs destined for my 25% tax-free lump sum would take several years to shift into an ISA, and this year is complicated by a possible need to bed and ISA some of the sharesave shares. Next year I will also have to think about opening a S&S ISA with a different firm. I’m happy with iii, but I only want to fill it to about three-quarters of the FSCS compensation limit (*) of £50,000 to give it room to breathe in the forthcoming awesome bull run from 2015 to 2020 .
*Note FSCS compensation on S&S ISAs is against the ISA provider iii going bust, it doesn’t compensate me for making crap investment moves